Book Now2012
Seminars

London, Brighton and Mauritius.

Reserve your place now.

Book now!

PhoneCharisma
CD

Featuring Binaural Inductive Technology

Learn More

PhoneProfile your charisma

How charismatic are you? FREE online profiling tool.

Charisma profile

Book NowFREE Corporate Charisma Enhancers

Weekly quotations that provoke, stimulate and enhance your
charisma at work.

Sign up

PhoneRequest a
call back

Interested in finding out more information?

Request call back

Archive for the ‘Famous charismatic icons’ Category

During my winter travels I’m often confronted with a variety of misconceptions about charisma; what it is and how does it transform the performance of an organisation.

People hold a stereotypical image in their mind that charismatic individuals are maverick extroverts with big personalities. This contradicts my own theory based on 30 years of research that charisma will only flow when the individual is being authentic and is working with a sense of personal purpose.

These misconceptions spread into an organisational context where leaders feel wary about possessing ‘more charisma’ because it is often perceived as a ‘La La’ skill that could place their business at greater levels of risk. Robert Maxwell, Fred Goodwin and Rupert Murdoch play out these stereotypes creating a negative attitude towards the whole concept of charisma and the value of charismatic leadership.

Yet organisations with challenging performance and productivity targets can find almost instantaneous benefits by developing the charismatic potential of their workforce. The quality of an engine fuel will directly impact on a vehicle’s performance. What we eat will affect our emotions, energy and health. In the same way, when an individual is operating from their authentic self and feels passionately about their work, they stimulate a flow of energy, thereby triggering the utilisation of their charismatic potential.

This unseen ‘power’ can be hugely beneficial to customer service representatives who find it easier to connect with their customers, even over the phone. One major pitfall of a customer service training programme is that individuals often pay lip service to what is required of them and can end up delivering a customer service process as automated robots, going through a script. Customers sense the difference between service delivered from the heart and superficial platitudes delivered from the head. Charisma ignites the customer service process so that customer interventions become unique and special creating a significant difference in customer attitudes towards that organisation.

Additionally, employees who are delivering service from their hearts are more engaged, more committed and more motivated than their ‘going through the motions’ peers. These charismatic individuals trigger a natural process of transmitting their positive energy so that the culture of a department can evolve organically from the mindset and charisma of just one or two individuals. In Quantum Physics this phenomenon is called entrainment – where particles and waves natural synchronise together.

In 2004, in conjunction with Vic Conant, President of Nightingale Conant we embarked upon the world’s biggest piece of sales research ever undertaken. 2663 organisations shared their views on barriers to sustainable sales success and the special ingredient that sets the top twenty percent of sales superstars apart from other sales people. Findings showed that charisma is the difference that makes a huge difference to successful sales people. Since that time I have been able to replicate charisma in any individual by working from the ‘inside out’ so the individual’s authenticity is upheld with integrity.

Early studies conducted since 2008 indicate that teaching people to activate more of their charismatic potential can benefit not just customer service and sales teams, it can benefit project managers, leaders, Heads of Departments and talent.
As many of today’s businesses are feeling ‘forced’ to make cutbacks, go back to basics and keep things operationally ‘tight’ it creates an unconscious chain of fear, pessimism and anxiety within customers who are craving their feel good fix. There is no such thing as ‘business as usual’ because the usual methods will leave organisations floundering under the weight of a tough global economy.

Charisma is a sustainable feel good fix that leads to high levels of productivity, high workforce engagement and customers who become raving fans of that organisation.

A few years ago Emotional Intelligence and Insights Personality Profiling were considered a soft and abstract ‘nice to have’ – today successful organisations have embraced the power of these tools, realising that workforce and customer engagement requires a ‘from the heart’ approach. One day in the short-term future, organisations will accept that this elusive thing we call ‘charisma’ is in reality an accelerated route to sustainable business success. As a pioneer of charisma within an organisational context I will continue to develop further case studies to prove conclusively that charisma directy impacts the bottom line.

Whilst the rain batters my office window with a relentless rhythm, I notice a flock of Canada Geese on the river prepare for their long journey homewards. Their V-shaped formation conserves energy and enables them to keep track of every bird in the group. Synergy and engagement combined with an instinctual sense of teamwork and common purpose. A perfect charismatic example to conclude this week’s blog!

During my seminars at The Globe, I’m often asked how I reconcile leaders who choose to exploit their charisma for malevolent purposes. When observing old film footage of Hitler, I could feel his intensity and see his effect on others created a strong physical reaction. A frightening combination of charisma and evil. Former boss of RBS, Fred Goodwin’s charisma was a major factor when persuading his board to support his strategic policies that ultimately played a major role in the biggest 2008 losses in corporate history. Charisma, combined with megalomania and greed is not a good combination for business success. These men clearly demonstrate that such is the power of charisma, there is a mantle of responsibility because this ‘charismatic power’ can be used for both good and evil intent.
Yet this need not deter an individual from wanting to develop their impact, presence and influence because my own studies prove conclusively that charisma equips the individual who possesses it with a significant advantage. Interestingly, people tend to stereotype charismatic individuals as having big personalities, being extrovert and maverick. Yet there are many examples of introverted and quieter charismatic people. For example, Mother Teresa, the late Princess of Wales and Richard Branson. I recognised that anyone holds the potential to be more charismatic – the secret is be yourself and do what you love doing.
On the subject of charismatic women, last night I attended the book launch of Jessica Richards, a personal transformation specialist and leadership mentor, who has published a moving account of how she beat cancer using a holistic approach. Jessica oozes authenticity and has shown such courage with the way she’s dealt with this frightening disease. When charismatic people such as Jessica, use their power for positive intent, it can inspire and transform the lives of thousands.
If you want to meet a bunch of charismatic individuals then pop into Pub du Vin’s Dome Room, Brighton on Monday 16th January at 5.30pm because I’ll be sharing my blueprint showing how everyone can optimise their charisma in a way that remains true and unique for them.
Have a great week!

You can’t turn on the news at the moment without hearing more bad news about the struggling state of the economy, rising debt and the human costs associated with keeping small businesses afloat. Yet a quiet revolution amongst discerning businesses looking for growth rather than survival has shown that simply by developing their leadership team’s charismatic potential has an almost instantaneous impact on their bottom line.

Having dedicated the last three decades to investigating how charisma benefits organisations I was delighted to have my research findings reinforced and validated by Hewitts Associates. They also identified that those organisations achieving double-digit growth have extremely high levels of workforce engagement. The quickest and most cost effective way to build engagement is by increasing the charisma of leaders, executive boards, entrepreneurs and senior management.

Yet, this presented a challenge for two reasons. Firstly, the definition of charisma varied widely and secondly, great charismatic icons exhibited their charisma in a way that was unique to them. You can’t teach people charismatic behaviours without diluting their authenticity – an immediate block to the flow of their natural charisma. Remember Gordon Brown, during the historical, live election debates in May 2010? I was providing live commentary on the three leaders’ charisma for a global television network alongside the Professor of British Politics, Stephen Hassler. Gordon Brown looked uncomfortable trying to compete with his two younger opponents and had been ’schooled’ in using power postures and gestures. He failed to engage the voting public because he was not speaking from his heart. In contrast, Nick Clegg who despite being less polished, talked with a natural and spontaneous passion that got him the coveted role of Deputy PM!
You can develop charisma by working from the ‘inside’. In fact, everyone already possesses charisma within themselves, yet because of the walls of protection and masks put up and on over the years, we disconnect from our own source of power. This is why I call my corporate charisma seminar, An Audience with Charisma – because the ‘audience’ already has charisma, I simply need to help them reconnect with it. The minute this happens, people light up like a Christmas Tree!
My journey into the world of ‘inside out’ took me to Dr Bruce Lipton’s research in the field of Epigenetics that proves the impact of thoughts and feelings on the way genes are expressed. Metaphorically speaking, the charisma gene is inherent within us all yet not all of us activate it. In 2004, in conjunction with Vic Conant, President of Nightingale Conant we embarked upon a huge piece of research with 2664 organisations globally. One conclusion found that mindset was the crucial, linking component between high performing, charismatic individuals.
In 2008 I published my blueprint for developing charisma and launched my first charisma seminar at Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre. Within just 2-days I transformed individuals’ level of impact, presence and gravitas that I measured with a range of assessment tools. (Check out your own level of charisma for free by visiting www.audiencewithcharisma.com/charisma-profile)
Last year I conducted a small study with 34 senior executives who rated themselves on 10 different attributes before and six weeks after attending An Audience with Charisma. The results were dramatic and have caused a plethora of questions from learning and development communities about how I can achieve such impressive and sustainable performance improvements. My response is often regarded as controversial, because I am using a blend of techniques that are literally at the frontiers of accelerated development. Noetic Science, Control Dramas, Quantum Physics, Reiki, Dowsing, Matrix Reimprinting are just some of the sources that have inspired my approach. Sometimes I’m asked if these techniques are just too way out for the corporate community to which I respond ” if I can deliver a sustainable change in the people I teach, does it matter how I do it.”

The model I use to develop charisma, encompasses five attributes that collectively I refer to as The Symbol for Star Quality. Charismatic people possess high levels of self-esteem and are comfortable in their own skin. They are genuine and authentic. Whilst they have the ability to adapt their behaviour, essentially they are always true to their real self. Charismatic people have a strong driving force because their work holds personal meaning. As a result they appear dynamic, enthusiastic and passionate. Charismatic people are emotionally intelligent. They listen to their intuition and communicate from their hearts as well as their heads. How can you engage people by logic alone? Charismatic people have a compelling vision that others feel a connection with. This creates a magnetic electro-magnetic force field that draws people to follow them. The fifth attribute is how charismatic people utilise their energy. At the smallest, quantum level we are all pulsating energy that ebbs and flows continuously. Interestingly, charismatic people can absorb and utilise the energy generated from others that allows them to exude even more energy. This energetic formula begins to explain the scientific rationale behind cult leadership.

Since my first Audience with Charisma at The Globe, I’ve helped hundreds of business professionals become more authentic, more charismatic and consequently more effective.

I came across a wonderfully provocative article written by Paul Graham, 2004 that was subsequently corrected in 2006 based on the theory; In US presidential elections, the more charismatic candidate wins. It presents a powerful case for charismatic leadership that should stimulate thinking and discussion! Enjoy this extract.
People who write about politics, whether on the left or the right, have a consistent bias: they take politics seriously. When one candidate beats another they look for political explanations. The country is shifting to the left, or the right. And that sort of shift can certainly be the result of a presidential election, which makes it easy to believe it was the cause.

But when I think about why I voted for Clinton over the first George Bush, it wasn’t because I was shifting to the left. Clinton just seemed more dynamic. He seemed to want the job more. Bush seemed old and tired. I suspect it was the same for a lot of voters.

Clinton didn’t represent any national shift leftward. He was just more charismatic than George Bush or (God help us) Bob Dole. In 2000 we practically got a controlled experiment to prove it: Gore had Clinton’s policies, but not his charisma, and he suffered proportionally. Same story in 2004. Kerry was smarter and more articulate than Bush, but rather a stiff. And Kerry lost.

As I looked further back, I kept finding the same pattern. Pundits said Carter beat Ford because the country distrusted the Republicans after Watergate. And yet it also happened that Carter was famous for his big grin and folksy ways, and Ford for being a boring klutz. Four years later, pundits said the country had lurched to the right. But Reagan, a former actor, also happened to be even more charismatic than Carter (whose grin was somewhat less cheery after four stressful years in office). In 1984 the charisma gap between Reagan and Mondale was like that between Clinton and Dole, with similar results. The first George Bush managed to win in 1988, though he would later be vanquished by one of the most charismatic presidents ever, because in 1988 he was up against the notoriously uncharismatic Michael Dukakis.

These are the elections I remember personally, but apparently the same pattern played out in 1964 and 1972. The most recent counterexample appears to be 1968, when Nixon beat the more charismatic Hubert Humphrey. But when you examine that election, it tends to support the charisma theory more than contradict it. As Joe McGinnis recounts in his famous book The Selling of the President 1968, Nixon knew he had less charisma than Humphrey, and thus simply refused to debate him on TV. He knew he couldn’t afford to let the two of them be seen side by side.

Now a candidate probably couldn’t get away with refusing to debate. But in 1968 the custom of televised debates was still evolving. In effect, Nixon won in 1968 because voters were never allowed to see the real Nixon. All they saw were carefully scripted campaign spots.

Oddly enough, the most recent true counterexample is probably 1960. Though this election is usually given as an example of the power of TV, Kennedy apparently would not have won without fraud by party machines in Illinois and Texas. But TV was still young in 1960; only 87% of households had it. Undoubtedly TV helped Kennedy, so historians are correct in regarding this election as a watershed. TV required a new kind of candidate. There would be no more Calvin Coolidges.

The charisma theory may also explain why Democrats tend to lose presidential elections. The core of the Democrats’ ideology seems to be a belief in government. Perhaps this tends to attract people who are earnest, but dull. Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry were so similar in that respect that they might have been brothers. Good thing for the Democrats that their screen lets through an occasional Clinton, even if some scandal results.

One would like to believe elections are won and lost on issues, if only fake ones like Willie Horton. And yet, if they are, we have a remarkable coincidence to explain. In every presidential election since TV became widespread, the apparently more charismatic candidate has won. Surprising, isn’t it, that voters’ opinions on the issues have lined up with charisma for 11 elections in a row?

The political commentators who come up with shifts to the left or right in their morning-after analyses are like the financial reporters stuck writing stories day after day about the random fluctuations of the stock market. Day ends, market closes up or down, reporter looks for good or bad news respectively, and writes that the market was up on news of Intel’s earnings, or down on fears of instability in the Middle East. Suppose we could somehow feed these reporters false information about market closes, but give them all the other news intact. Does anyone believe they would notice the anomaly, and not simply write that stocks were up (or down) on whatever good (or bad) news there was that day? That they would say, hey, wait a minute, how can stocks be up with all this unrest in the Middle East?

I’m not saying that issues don’t matter to voters. Of course they do. But the major parties know so well which issues matter how much to how many voters, and adjust their message so precisely in response, that they tend to split the difference on the issues, leaving the election to be decided by the one factor they can’t control: charisma.

If the Democrats had been running a candidate as charismatic as Clinton in the 2004 election, he’d have won. And we’d be reading that the election was a referendum on the war in Iraq, instead of that the Democrats are out of touch with evangelical Christians in middle America.

During the 1992 election, the Clinton campaign staff had a big sign in their office saying “It’s the economy, stupid.” Perhaps it was even simpler than they thought.

Last week’s seminar at The Globe Theatre saw a courageous group of people take steps into unknown territory as they encountered techniques and concepts that stretched their thinking. Each seminar begins with a room full of strangers, by the end, strong bonds of friendship are forged during a 48 hour journey of self-discovery. This group has inspired the theme for this week’s blog – courage.

Joan of Arc won the loyalty of her soldiers based on her courage and charisma. During that time, the military was a male subculture within which men in military elites were jealously protective of their own elite status. Joan’s ability to join this elite should have been crippled three times over: by her young age (she was hardly more than a child), by the fact that she was a peasant in a feudal society and because she was female. Yet Joan’s innate courage made thousands of men want to follow her.

Nelson Mandela’s life is a story of huge courage. He endured a twenty-three year imprisonment for his dream of a better and equal South Africa. Mandela said ‘I learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear.’ This man’s vision was so completely and utterly compelling for him that he had no other choice except to stand by his beliefs in the face of devastating personal adversity.

Sir Ranulph Fiennes has been described as the world’s greatest living explorer and was awarded an OBE for human endeavour and charitable services. His courage when faced with nature’s most dangerous and difficult challenges is a great analogy for leaders in the business world. The elements vital to the success of an expedition include teamwork, courage, determination, resilience and the ability to perform under extreme pressure. These same qualities are all crucial to success in the business world.

For a charismatic leader working within a corporate environment, the very nature of their character and personality gives rise to a plethora of situations in which they require courage and steely nerves to pursue what they believe to be right.

A charismatic leader not only requires personal courage but can also benefit from actively promoting an environment within which people are encouraged to be courageous. In a courageous climate:

• Difficult things can be said
• There won’t be a sense of fear about what may happen in the future
• People can develop through controlled risk-taking – it’s OK to make a mistake
• Performance and productivity soars without the choking restraints of fear
• Ideas are welcomes and creativity increases
• People find it easier to adapt and accept changes.

Charismatic leaders possess the ability to engage in courageous conversations. This requires courageous listening, courageous decision-making, courageous action, the courage to set and enforce standards of behaviour, and the courage to do what it takes to change destructive existing habits. Courageous leadership requires people to see what others don’t want to see, and do what others don’t want to do.

An organisation may have the ability to make the necessary changes, but it requires courageous leaders who possess strength, conviction, and the stamina to hold on through the inevitable resistance. Chuck Yeager, the first person to break the sound barrier, reported that as he approached the barrier, it was the most turbulent ride of his life, but once he broke through, it became the calmest.

Having had a meeting today with a charismatic business woman, I felt inspired to reflect on best ways to deal with charismatic people. Something that might come in handy when you meet Alan Sugar or Richard Branson. Whether you work for a charismatic boss, manage a charismatic individual or have a charismatic client, there are a number of suggested approaches that can optimise the quality of your communication.

• Actively listen and seek to really understand their viewpoint before giving your response. Charismatic people are much more receptive if they have put forward their perspective first.
• The impact of their presence can positively distort their communication, so you see what they are saying through rose-tinted glasses. You can help maintain objectivity by delaying your reaction or response, which will give you time to evaluate the content of what they have communicated.
• Charismatic people like people who are like themselves. Therefore, use matching and mirroring techniques to build rapport and increase the impact of your communication.
• Be yourself and say what you really think and believe. You’ll gain more respect from charismatic individuals if you are acting with authenticity.
• Have clarity around what is important to them and respect these factors. If you suggest actions that contradict their career values, they will be aggressive and protective.
• When presenting your ideas to them, illustrate how your ideas support their personal vision.
• Don’t play it safe – be creative and imaginative with your ideas; this earns their respect.
• Negativity drains their energy. Rather than explain why something won’t work, highlight different options that may work even better.
• Give them plenty of opportunities to influence and persuade others. If you have something to communicate, their support of what you want to say can leverage a positive outcome from others.
• If you have made a mistake – admit it. Charismatic people appreciate courage, risk-taking and accepting responsibility for every action.
• Pay attention to their physiological triggers – use these when communicating your point of view back to them.

Ultimately, remember that your instincts and gut reaction is your own emotional guidance system. Listen to your own instincts first and trust your intuition – you’ll be amazed at how accurately you’ll be able to summarise every situation. Enjoy your interactions with charismatic people, because if you are open and flexible you’ll automatically start to absorb some of their magical powers.

The King of Charisma

January 11th 2011 by Nikki Owen | Confidence, Famous charismatic icons


The auditorium is packed with rows of expectant ‘wanna-be’ millionaires in sharp suits; the smell of anticipation adding excitement to noisy conversations. The audience is eagerly awaiting the arrival of an American self-help writer and speaker who guarantees to change lives, changing them within a matter of hours. On this cold, rainy day in February 1991, I sat entranced in Wembley Arena watching one man hold the attention of the audience for 8 hours. The stage was unadorned – just him, a stool and a microphone. Undoubtedly the King of Charisma he was dynamic and simply awesome with an ability to influence and motivate.

Shortly after seeing Tony Robbins at Wembley I met Paul Mckenna, one of the UK’s leading hypnotists, and I was instantly struck by the contrast in his personality. Quieter and more restrained than Tony, he none-the-less possessed the seemingly effortless skill to compel attention and hold interest.

During my career I have often found myself in the company of individuals who have that indefinable quality that draws you to them and leaves you feeling wonderfully energised as a result of meeting them. As a teenager I studied theatre and the performing arts. I noticed then that technical excellence was not a prerequisite for a brilliant performance. Sometimes an artiste would walk onto the stage yielding an invisible power that captivated and mesmerised their audience whom they were able to move to tears.

Charismatic people became my passion. I started to notice them in the same way that you start seeing loads of cars similar to the one you’ve just bought because it has been flushed into your conscious awareness. I paid attention to the way they spoke, how they moved, their posture, the types of words they used and the more I noticed the harder it was to categorise the elements that typify this level of intensive magnetism. I met charismatic people who were tall, had powerful voices and appeared utterly confident. Others were tiny in stature, spoke very little yet appeared to really listen to what I was feeling.
From CEOs within big organisations to self-made millionaires, brilliant salespeople to faith healers, I saw that charisma was a gift that just kept on giving in terms of the beneficial advantages it created for its owner.

Up until recently, many believed that you either had charisma or not. Given that I’ve dedicated the majority of my career to training and development I know you can teach almost everything if the learner is motivated and the appropriate learning method is used. Yet ‘charisma’ isn’t just a collection of highly refined techniques. You can’t teach people these skills without seeking to create a mindset change. That’s why charisma needs to be developed by adopting the dual perspectives of ‘inside-out’ and ‘outside-in’, working holistically in the knowledge that the mind and body are totally interconnected.

The swirling snowstorm made it difficult for the old man to see as he slowly trudged along the road of his destiny. Lines of experience etched his ruddy face and already the touch of frost cast a silvery glow that clung like limpets to his long red coat…

At that moment he was catapulted through time, to the magical Father of Christmas… his wizened face crinkled into a warm smile as he fondly remembered the innocence of childhood slumberings, expectations of the days’ dawning. The exquisite joy of possessing the power to transform dreams into reality was worth the labours of the chimney, and even when they began erecting those modern dwellings void of fireplaces, his sense of adventure always managed to find a way to present his gifts, cramming stockings and pillowcases full of each year’s endeavours. Yet, over the years he’d heard too many times, “I don’t believe in Father Christmas” that it began to echo like an un-tuned piano, vibrating through the core of his very being… and his biggest mistake was that he began to believe the untruths he was hearing, until overnight he became old and his adventurous spirit became ashes where the fire had once burned so brightly…

And then a sound of the past allowed itself to penetrate his deaf ears, not listening, yet hearing the tinklings of tiny bells. There in front of him stood Rudolf, his trusty stead resplendent in his tawny winter coat. The old man’s eyes watered, ice turning to tears as he confronted his biggest fear… What to do now that he’d given up on his dreams? Except, the kindly reindeer refused to budge… “Whatever you believe about the children is what you believe about yourself, there is no magic without you and you are without magic if you don’t believe in yourself.”

It was time to decide, a decision that would affect the rest of his life as he knew it, and there in the vast, majestic landscape of the snowy capped mountains he made his choice…

…the very act of choosing caused a great warmth to spread throughout his body transferring itself to Rudolf who nose what that feels like…”Let me fly even higher tonight” whispered the old man growing younger every moment, “For there is important work to be done.”

Whatever challenges you may face in the coming year know that all your dreams are worth fighting for; after all, you have the infinite potential inside to create 2011 exactly as you choose.

Release your authentic power and enjoy a magical Charismas!

How thrilling to sit down to watch the final of The Apprentice last night. I liked Chris Bates and Stella English although for me Stella consistently appeared to be in a class of her own. Creating and developing a new drink for the huge drinks market was a fabulous final task that showcased their skills at innovation, market research, branding, packaging design and presenting. The moment that Stella came up with the name ‘Urban’ I thought to myself “she’s won this!” A great concept and her presentation was utterly professional yet personal and delivered with charm and humour. I was slightly stunned that Chris got caught up into the trap of getting too engrossed into his art direction role – pulling off another rather tacky TV ad – big lesson I learned years ago is to keep it simple. Stella’s reaction to being told by Sir Alan “You’re Hired!” was wonderfully moving. She appears to have had a tough childhood that has given her a steely determination to make her mark on this world. Often described by her fellow candidates as ‘aloof’ and ‘a bit cold’ she appeared genuinely moved to tears upon hearing that she’d finally done it. Good luck to both Chris and Stella!

Amanda Platell was on last night’s panel, catapulting me back to the late 1990s. I was working with (not for) the BBC on a TV quiz show format I had developed called ‘Playzone’. As the creator of numerous business games I got carried away one night and developed an adult board game!!!! At the time BBC 2 liked the concept for a TV quiz show to go ‘head-to-head’ against Channel 4’s The Word. I still have photos of the set featuring giant banana sofas and a ‘gunge tank’ A meeting was arranged with Amanda Platell who at the time was editor of The Sun. We were pitching for a sponsorship deal for ‘Playzone’ that would fund the TV programme. Her reputation was such that I felt excited and terrified at the prospect of meeting her – not that I needed to as she cancelled my meeting whilst I was in reception leaving me to ponder on what might have been should I have got to see her. Thankfully ‘Playzone’ never went ahead and my business reputation remained intact!!

As the countdown to Christmas enters the last few days I find myself feeling rather reflective. The more I learn, the more I realise that enjoying every moment of life is even more important than thinking too much about the future. Our point of power is now – we can create everything we want by choosing our thoughts with conscious volition. To borrow a phrase from Richard Bach’s book, Illusions ‘ The River delights to lift us free, if only we dare to let go. Our true work is this voyage, this adventure.’

Have an adventurous week and enjoy the festive spirit.

This is the first time during series 6 of The Apprentice that I have been stunned by Lord Sugar’s latest firing. Liz Locke has great people skills; she sold double the value of tickets compared to ego-maniac Stuart Baggs and demonstrates more integrity. Could it be that Sir Alan is relishing the public humiliation of Stuart during the interviews or does he genuinely admire the self-made millionaire? Who knows, yet I still felt dismayed that maybe even such a charismatic and well-respected businessman might be swayed by TV ratings and audience figures?
I like Jamie and thoroughly enjoyed his ghoulish accounts of gruesome murders yet I don’t really rate him as an inspirational leader. He makes me laugh, he has lots of likeability (Stuart take note) and yet he kind of does his own thing. My ideal final would see a stand off between the cool, calm and collected Stella English and the droll, ‘poshly spoken’ Chris Bates. Two very different candidates with very different personalities and styles yet both have interesting strengths that would provide a great climax to this series.

I LOVED the panel on the BBC Two – You’re Fired! Vanessa Feltz oozes charisma – she is passionate, witty, articulate and very astute. I particularly liked her strong stance with supporting Liz. Ms Feltz you are looking really good these days, you radiate an aura of happiness – bring it on!

With Christmas fast approaching I was somewhat dismayed when a journalist asked if they could include my Charismatic Conditioning CD as a suggested gift for your enemies???!!! Obviously in my mind, this is a top pressie for anyone yet finally managed to see the funny side.

I hope the WikiLeaks cyber saboteurs of the Visa, Mastercard and PayPal haven’t interrupted your online shopping pleasures – wow, what power! Note to self ‘Investigate the concept of charismatic cybering’

Have a great week