Book Now2010/2011
Seminars

Held at Shakespeare's Globe Theatre, London.

Reserve your place now.

Book now!

PhoneRequest a
call back

Interested in finding out more information?

Request call back

PhoneProfile your charisma

How charismatic are you? FREE online profiling tool.

Charisma profile

Book NowFREE
e-Bulletin

Suggestions to expand your charisma, tips to increase your impact and ways to develop gravitas. FREE e-bulletin.

Sign up

Posts Tagged ‘TV’

The closest election in living memory

May 6th 2010 by Nikki Owen | General

I absolutely adore Gaunty (Jon Gaunt) on SunTalk Radio! He can be as tough as Nick Ferrari (LBC) at times, yet he is a brilliant interviewer! Maybe I am biased – having started calling me the UK’s Leading expert in confidence and charisma, I was then elevated by the end of the week  to “the world’s greatest confidence and charisma expert!!!” Bring it on Gaunty!!!

Today is Election Day and I have never felt so passionately about politics and voting as I feel about this election. Being part of the TV Political Commentary Team has probably stirred me up, particularly with the X-Factor style debates – what a powerful demonstration of the importance of personal impact, gravitas and charisma.

 Just off to vote………Let’s change our world today.

 Thank you

Final debate who’s on top!!

May 5th 2010 by Nikki Owen | Charisma on TV, General

Nick Clegg

His biggest skill is his ability to pace, reflect the feelings of the majority of the people – he uses language we can understand and he delivers what he has to say with utter conviction – you believe him. He is more animated than the other two candidates, uses bigger gestures and appears more natural/less rehearsed. He uses lots of light and shade in his voice so he ‘sounds’ interesting and he uses highly emotive language that is designed to elicit an emotional reaction:

“The style of old politics”

“Shadows of our economy, shadows of our society”

“In tears”

“Get real”

He talks in a bigger picture, more abstract way that cleverly gains agreement because the more detailed you are (Such as Gordon Brown) the more likely you are to create disagreement.

Nick Clegg is selling ‘utopia’ and he uses his position as middle-man to explain to the viewers what David Cameron and Gordon Brown are really saying so he positions himself as one of us.

His relaxed hand-in-pocket posture exudes he is relaxed and not phoney.

As the debate progressed his lack of experience and naïve views were highlighted yet he was absolutely performing at his peak for 80% of the debate.

 Gordon Brown

He is very detailed which demonstrates how smart he is, yet I believe this goes over the heads of most of the viewers. His whole approach was about linking fear and panic to the other parties. “Let us not make a mistake” He was aggressive and very attacking of  Cameron – he kept repeating his point about inheritance tax regardless of its relevance to the initial question. This is a clever way to reinforce a point – repetition is used in every advertising campaign. He looks but doesn’t see because he is so caught up in the content of his thoughts so he doesn’t ‘connect with the viewer –

His best moment was his response to the banker’s bonus question when he appeared utterly credible. There was a moment when he was talking about his mother and he softened – if he could show more of this side of him he would be so much more appealing.

Looks rigid, old school, like a man struggling – his words were negative.

 David Cameron

Appeared more nervous than the other two as evidenced by his rate of blinking and when he is nervous he appears ‘stiffer’. Yet as the debate progressed he relaxed and his performance steadily improved. His pace was measured and he looked unflustered and in control especially impressive given the amount of attacks he received from Gordon Brown. He appeared reasonable and knowledgeable – the only small mistake he made was when he referred to “the questioner” he could have used their name. Solid assured performance not as dynamic as Nick Clegg yet built credibility as debate progressed.

 Ties

Did you notice their ties? David Cameron was wearing his usual blue coloured tie yet Gordon Brown’s was purple with white spots? An attempt to visually show he was trendy and contemporary perhaps. Nick Clegg’s tie was orange – what do you get if you mix red and yellow? Was he unconsciously conveying his preference of party alliance?

Enter stage left…Nick Clegg!

April 22nd 2010 by Nikki Owen | Charisma on TV

Last Thursday, political history was made when the UK held its first ever live debate between the party leaders. I was asked by news channel, Aljazeera to share my views on the level of confidence and charisma demonstrated by each party leader. If you are a subscriber to my Monthly e-Bulletin then you would have read some of my thoughts on the leaders prior to the debate. I must confess that I, like many,  was taken by surprise –  Nick Clegg absolutely shone that night, speaking with authenticity and passion. Gordon Brown’s gravitas gave him a strong presence, yet for me his carefully orchestrated hand gestures looked contrived and controlling. David Cameron, who had the most to lose by participating in this debate, was like a large jumbo jet that never quite got off the ground; polished paintwork, impressive to look at yet didn’t fly. If ever there was an example to demonstrate the impact and power of charisma then this debate was it!

 Since last Thursday’s debate, the Liberal Democrats have seen a massive surge in popularity, mainly in part to Nick Clegg’s performance. In my last newsletter, I asked the rhetorical question about replicating the Obama phenomenon. Who really would have thought that within a few days The Guardian would be likening Clegg to the President of the United States?  Possessing charisma does increase your ability to influence others more effectively! I’m looking forward to ‘Round 2’ tonight and will again be sharing my views on  Aljazeera at 10.00pm.  

Special mention to Tommy Boyd who interviewed me on Friday for Sun Talk Radio - remember when he co-presented the children’s programme Magpie in the late 1970s? What a lovely man – thoroughly enjoyed our chat.

Have a great week!

The most charismatic election ever?

April 12th 2010 by Nikki Owen | General, Uncategorized

It’s good to be back after the Easter break – Gordon Brown announcing the date of the general election for May 6th  made me wonder whether any of the main party political leaders can replicate the Obama phenomenon. By speaking from the heart and delivering passionate speeches, Obama was able to grab his audience’s attention, like no other presidential candidate before him.

 It has been suggested that his vision created an intensive force field which had the effect of acting  like a huge magnet  - his intention physically affected the voting public. Yet with his magnetic vision he still noticed the ordinary man and woman – at one event he gave a glass of water to a woman who had just fainted, demonstrating his ability to show compassion. 

 I have been asked by a television news channel to attend the live debates with all three political leaders and critique their charisma and confidence so have been very tempted to reveal my initial views about all three of them in our forthcoming bulletin due out next week.

I’m so excited! My training is featured in episode  4 of ‘ Kitchen Sink to Catwalk’, a new television programme on the Bio channel that begins on February 16th.

Six fabulous women, all aged over 40, compete for a chance to become the next big thing in modelling.

Without giving too much away (you’ll have to tune in on March 9th), I take them on a voyage of self-discovery at Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre,  working on their self-esteem which ends with a dramatic finale!  This emotional transformation, as you can imagine, produced intense feelings as they embarked on a new career.

Whilst the ladies agreed that the exercises had thrown up  ‘the unexpected’, they all found it a very positive process. In the words of one contestant, “There are (so many) women like us who live on a daily basis without exploring the things (tasks) we did today”.